| Company / Product | True active-active writes | Multi-master | Conflict handling | Monitoring / dashboard | Standard PostgreSQL? | My view | | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------- | ------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | ----------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- | | [pgEdge](https://www.pgedge.com/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | **Excellent fit** | | [EDB Postgres Distributed](https://www.enterprisedb.com/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ Advanced | ✅ PEM | ✅ PostgreSQL-based | **Enterprise-grade** | | [MyDBOps](https://www.mydbops.com/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) | ⚠️ Can design/manage | ⚠️ Depends on technology | Depends | ✅ | ✅ | **Service/consulting provider** | | Percona | ⚠️ PostgreSQL HA focus | Not its main PostgreSQL product | — | ✅ PMM | ✅ | Better for HA/monitoring than true multi-master | | YugabyteDB | ✅ | ✅ distributed | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ PostgreSQL-compatible | Excellent distributed DB, but not ordinary PostgreSQL | | CockroachDB | ✅ | ✅ distributed | Built into distributed transaction model | ✅ | ⚠️ PostgreSQL wire compatible | Same caveat: not actual PostgreSQL |