aipackage/specs/001-enterprise-experience/checklists/requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Enterprise Appliance Experience Hardening

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-07-12 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

• No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
• Focused on user value and business needs
• Written for non-technical stakeholders
• All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

• No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
• Requirements are testable and unambiguous
• Success criteria are measurable
• Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
• All acceptance scenarios are defined
• Edge cases are identified
• Scope is clearly bounded
• Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

• All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
• User scenarios cover primary flows
• Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
• No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

• Validation completed on 2026-07-12.
• Revalidated after five clarification decisions on 2026-07-12; all 16 items remain passing.
• The clarification pass is complete and the specification is ready for $speckit-plan.

Installer Architecture Readiness (2026-07-14)

• Four bootable products and implementation order are explicit.
• Exact zero-network acceptance and payload boundaries are testable.
• Signing, integrity, update, rollback, interruption, sizing, and evidence contracts are defined.
• Large-model packs and the shared offline-update format are separated from bootable media.
• Model-pack quarantine, shared-object references, dependencies, uninstall, garbage collection, entitlement changes and redistribution-license changes have deterministic lifecycle rules.
• Release signing trust domains, custody, separation of duties, receipts, rotation, revocation and compromised-root recovery are specified separately from named-owner approvals.
• Installer assets, adversaries, trust boundaries, threats, controls, invariants, abuse tests and residual risks are defined across the full release lifecycle.
• Every remaining Gate 1 decision has an accountable role, acceptable outcome and required approval/evidence field in one consolidated dossier.
• Public planning artifacts use Cezen Technologies as accountable organization while restricted approval records retain authorized-person attribution and separation-of-duties evidence.
• Signing/revocation ownership and key-custody policy are approved.
• Machine-readable manifest and compatibility schemas are approved.
• Workstation hardware and starter-model revisions are pinned.
• Online Universal Server endpoint/trust/acquisition contract is approved.
• Update rollback, license-offline, payload inventory, and lab/evidence ownership blockers close.
• All 30 Gate 1 architecture decisions carry Cezen Technologies approval records.
• Gate 1 closure is audited against its normative definition and remaining evidence is allocated to Gates 2-6 without treating approval as implementation authority.
• Gate 2 implementation-readiness evidence and restricted assignments are complete.
• Gates 3-6 artifact, physical, update/model and release evidence are produced and reviewed.

The original enterprise-experience specification remains planned. Installer implementation readiness is separately blocked until the unchecked items and analysis blockers B1-B11 are resolved.